Good Info News Wire
Where truth meets curiosity

DNC Rules Enable Alternative if Biden Steps Aside, Team Suggests

By Good Info News Wire on July 3, 2024

Article Summary –

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has distributed talking points asserting that Joe Biden will remain the party’s nominee for president, dismissing rumors of a possible replacement. The circulated documents suggest there is no procedural means of replacing the nominee. However, party insiders confirm there is indeed a process for replacing Biden post-convention, should he voluntarily step down, with the DNC chair nominating a replacement in consultation with key party figures.

Democratic National Committee Suggests No Procedural Means to Replace Biden

Recently circulated talking points by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) indicate there may be no procedural means to replace President Joe Biden as the party’s nominee. This follows as Biden’s campaign aims to ease anxious Democrats. However, some insiders believe the DNC is downplaying the existing process if Biden steps aside.

The DNC Asserts Biden as the Sole Eligible Nominee

According to DNC’s recent talking points, “Joe Biden will be the Democratic Party’s nominee for president,” dismissing any other discussions as distractions. Despite Biden’s insistence on remaining in the race, speculations continue about the process of replacing him post the party’s August convention.

The Process of Replacing Biden

As per current party rules and the DNC’s 2022 convention procedures document, there is a process for replacing Biden should he step aside voluntarily after the convention. Democratic National Committee Chair Jamie Harrison would be responsible for naming a new nominee in consultation with other party leaders. This nomination would then be presented to DNC members for approval or rejection.

Vice President Kamala Harris as Possible Substitute Nominee

Insiders suggest Vice President Kamala Harris could be the substitute nominee if Biden steps down, given the Federal Election Commission rules on fund transfers. Harris’s nomination seems plausible considering the political implications, including maintaining support from Black voters and women.

Convention Delegates Hold Power to Choose Nominee

Before the convention, Biden-elected convention delegates hold the power to choose the party’s nominee. If Biden vacates the nomination after receiving it, DNC members would choose the nominee. Convention delegates could potentially alter the rules at the convention, which occurs post-nomination via a virtual roll call.

Biden as the Only Candidate to Lead the Party

Despite these discussions, Biden’s campaign and its allies are asserting that he is the sole candidate capable of representing the party in November. Some Democrats have started mentioning both names, Biden and Harris, when discussing the presidential candidate, hinting at the possibility of the vice president becoming the party’s presidential candidate.

Read More US News

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

All Good Info News Wire articles are open source through CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium, as long as you follow these guidelines: 

 

  • You must give Good Info News Wire credit, including https://goodinfo.news/ and the author’s name. 

  • Stories may be edited for in-house style or to shorten, but you must indicate if any changes were made. 

  • You can publish our graphics and any photos that are credited to Good Info News Wire with the stories with which they originally appeared. 

  • Don’t sell the story, publish it behind a paywall, or sell ads against the story. However, you can publish it on a page with ads you’ve already sold.

DNC Rules Enable Alternative if Biden Steps Aside, Team Suggests

by Good Info News Wire, Good Info News Wire
July 3, 2024

1

Author

Related Posts

Wisconsin Ballot Drop Boxes Return After Court Ruling

Some Biden DNC Delegates Doubt Their Pledge

New York Disbars Giuliani for 2020 Election Falsehoods

Possible Thunderstorms, Tornadoes in Massachusetts: Sunday Storm Map

2024 Election: Biden-Trump Debate Complicates Voter Decision



Amid the heated political climate, the recent Biden-Trump debate has made deciding for the 2024 Election even harder for voters. The exchange showcased the stark contrast between the two candidates, leaving voters in a dilemma.



Voters are struggling to weigh their options, with neither candidate clearly taking the lead. They’re torn between Biden’s experience and Trump’s promise of change. Their unique perspectives and policies are making the 2024 Election one of the most challenging yet.



Analysts suggest this debate may have significant implications on the election outcome. It has fueled voter confusion, making the choice between Biden and Trump more complicated. The debate brought crucial issues to the fore, but left voters questioning who the better choice is for the presidency.



This election could be a turning point in American history, with the country’s future hanging in the balance. As the Election Day draws nearer, the voters are weighing up the pros and cons of each candidate, their track records, and their proposed visions for the country.



The Biden-Trump debate has certainly stirred the pot, making what was already a difficult decision for many voters, even tougher. As voters grapple with their choices, the 2024 Election remains unpredictable and unprecedented.

Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Six-Week Abortion Ban



The Iowa Supreme Court recently confirmed a six-week abortion ban, sparking nationwide debate. This controversial decision places restrictions on women’s rights, making it one of the strictest in the US.



The ruling was a major victory for anti-abortion activists. It both challenges the constitutional rights of women and tests the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortions nationwide.



The legislation, also known as the “fetal heartbeat law,” prohibits abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically around six weeks into pregnancy. This is often before a woman even realizes she is pregnant, triggering concerns about women’s ability to make informed decisions.



Critics argue that this ban infringes on women’s reproductive rights. They also point out that it disregards the health and safety of women, particularly those from low-income backgrounds who may not have access to early pregnancy tests.



Despite the backlash, supporters of the ban believe it will protect unborn children. They argue that it promotes the sanctity of life from the moment a heartbeat is detected.



The six-week abortion ban in Iowa is part of a larger national trend, with multiple states introducing similar legislation. This escalating political debate over abortion rights is feared to further polarize the nation.

Vermont Awards $175K to Man Detained for Obscene Gesture to State Trooper



In an unprecedented move, Vermont has agreed to compensate a man to the tune of $175,000 following his unlawful arrest for directing an obscene gesture at a state trooper. This settlement highlights the importance of respecting citizens’ First Amendment rights, even in situations that might initially seem disrespectful to law enforcement officers.



The man, identified as Gregory Bombard, was pulled over and detained by a state trooper in 2018. This action came after Bombard extended his middle finger to the officer, a gesture protected under the First Amendment as it constitutes a form of free speech. As a consequence, the arrest was deemed inappropriate by the legal authorities, leading to this remarkable settlement.



The verdict serves as a reminder for law enforcement to uphold individuals’ rights to freedom of expression, even when these expressions are offensive. While it might be seen as disrespectful, it’s crucial to remember that the First Amendment protects such acts unless they incite violence or harm.



This case has brought the protection of First Amendment rights into the spotlight, emphasizing the need for law enforcement agencies to adapt their conduct. Going forward, it’s expected that this precedent will influence the training and approach of police departments across the country, thereby ensuring the protection of free speech rights.
Comments (0)
Add Comment