Good Info News Wire
Where truth meets curiosity

Trump’s Trial: Potential Jail for Gag Violations During Hush Money Case

By Good Info News Wire on May 7, 2024

Article Summary –

Stormy Daniels took the stand in the hush money trial of former President Donald Trump, sharing information about a sexual encounter she claims to have had with Trump in 2006 and was later paid to keep silent about during the 2016 presidential election. Her testimony is crucial to the case because Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, paid Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet about the encounter just weeks before the 2016 election. Trump denies the sexual encounter and claims he has never directed any payments to be logged as legal expenses, a designation that prosecutors argue was intentionally misleading.

Stormy Daniels Testifies in Trump’s Hush Money Trial

On Tuesday, adult film actress Stormy Daniels took the witness stand in the hush money trial against former U.S. President Donald Trump. Daniels was there to share her account of an alleged 2006 sexual encounter with Trump, which resulted in a payoff in 2016 to keep her silent during the presidential election.

Daniels made her way to the courtroom without acknowledging Trump, who was also present. Her anticipated testimony carries significant weight in this trial, which has fluctuated between tabloid-like elements and mundane details of record-keeping.

The key aspect of Daniels’ testimony revolves around the final weeks of Trump’s 2016 Republican presidential campaign. Trump’s ex-lawyer and personal fixer, Michael Cohen, paid Daniels $130,000 to stay silent about their alleged sexual encounter at a celebrity golf event in Lake Tahoe in July 2006. Trump has consistently denied having sex with Daniels and maintains his innocence.

At the start of her testimony, Daniels stated that she met Trump at the golf event as her adult film company was a sponsor. After an initial conversation about her work in the film industry, Trump later invited her to dinner, an invitation she accepted.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys had earlier debated the scope of Daniels’ testimony. Trump’s lawyer, Susan Necheles, requested to exclude details of the alleged sexual encounter from Daniels’ testimony. However, the judge permitted limited testimony.

Testimonies have revealed that the payment to Daniels came at a crucial period, just after the 2005 “Access Hollywood” footage surfaced, showing Trump boasting about grabbing women’s genitals without consent. According to witnesses, the following day Trump spoke with Cohen and Hope Hicks, his campaign’s press secretary, to limit the damage caused by the tape and to prevent his alleged affairs from making headlines.

Cohen made the payment to Daniels after her then-lawyer, Keith Davidson, informed him that she was ready to publicly confirm her sexual encounter with Trump. Prosecutors revealed that Daniels had attempted to sell her story to a celebrity gossip magazine, Life & Style, in 2011.

The trial has also heard testimonies from two witnesses, including a former Trump Organization controller, who provided details about how the company reimbursed payments designed to suppress embarrassing stories and falsely recorded them as legal expenses. It was noted that the reimbursement checks came from Trump’s personal account.

Throughout the testimonies, there was no evidence suggesting that Trump had asked for the payments to be recorded as legal expenses. Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, but has pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing. This trial marks the first of his four criminal cases to reach a jury.

Read More US News

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

All Good Info News Wire articles are open source through CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium, as long as you follow these guidelines: 

 

  • You must give Good Info News Wire credit, including https://goodinfo.news/ and the author’s name. 

  • Stories may be edited for in-house style or to shorten, but you must indicate if any changes were made. 

  • You can publish our graphics and any photos that are credited to Good Info News Wire with the stories with which they originally appeared. 

  • Don’t sell the story, publish it behind a paywall, or sell ads against the story. However, you can publish it on a page with ads you’ve already sold.

Trump’s Trial: Potential Jail for Gag Violations During Hush Money Case

by Good Info News Wire, Good Info News Wire
May 7, 2024

1

Author

aAP Top NewsDonald Trumpgeneral newsIndictmentsJuriesLegal proceedingsManhattanMichael CohennNY State WireNYC State WirepPoliticsStephanie CliffordTrialsU.S. news
Related Posts

Wisconsin Ballot Drop Boxes Return After Court Ruling

Some Biden DNC Delegates Doubt Their Pledge

DNC Rules Enable Alternative if Biden Steps Aside, Team Suggests

New York Disbars Giuliani for 2020 Election Falsehoods

Possible Thunderstorms, Tornadoes in Massachusetts: Sunday Storm Map

2024 Election: Biden-Trump Debate Complicates Voter Decision



Amid the heated political climate, the recent Biden-Trump debate has made deciding for the 2024 Election even harder for voters. The exchange showcased the stark contrast between the two candidates, leaving voters in a dilemma.



Voters are struggling to weigh their options, with neither candidate clearly taking the lead. They’re torn between Biden’s experience and Trump’s promise of change. Their unique perspectives and policies are making the 2024 Election one of the most challenging yet.



Analysts suggest this debate may have significant implications on the election outcome. It has fueled voter confusion, making the choice between Biden and Trump more complicated. The debate brought crucial issues to the fore, but left voters questioning who the better choice is for the presidency.



This election could be a turning point in American history, with the country’s future hanging in the balance. As the Election Day draws nearer, the voters are weighing up the pros and cons of each candidate, their track records, and their proposed visions for the country.



The Biden-Trump debate has certainly stirred the pot, making what was already a difficult decision for many voters, even tougher. As voters grapple with their choices, the 2024 Election remains unpredictable and unprecedented.

Iowa Supreme Court Upholds Six-Week Abortion Ban



The Iowa Supreme Court recently confirmed a six-week abortion ban, sparking nationwide debate. This controversial decision places restrictions on women’s rights, making it one of the strictest in the US.



The ruling was a major victory for anti-abortion activists. It both challenges the constitutional rights of women and tests the Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortions nationwide.



The legislation, also known as the “fetal heartbeat law,” prohibits abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically around six weeks into pregnancy. This is often before a woman even realizes she is pregnant, triggering concerns about women’s ability to make informed decisions.



Critics argue that this ban infringes on women’s reproductive rights. They also point out that it disregards the health and safety of women, particularly those from low-income backgrounds who may not have access to early pregnancy tests.



Despite the backlash, supporters of the ban believe it will protect unborn children. They argue that it promotes the sanctity of life from the moment a heartbeat is detected.



The six-week abortion ban in Iowa is part of a larger national trend, with multiple states introducing similar legislation. This escalating political debate over abortion rights is feared to further polarize the nation.
Comments (0)
Add Comment